Advertisement Pulsed vs. Continuous UV for in-line Sterilization or Sanitation - Pharmaceutical Business review
Pharmaceutical Business review is using cookies

ContinueLearn More
Close

SteriBeam Systems

PUV and PEF Sterilisation and Nutrient Extraction-Enrichment System

More info about SteriBeam Systems

Pulsed vs. Continuous UV for in-line Sterilization or Sanitation

Using Pulsed Light for sanitizing cups, lids and packs causes unjustified high capital losses (1 to 25) and high operating losses per cup or lid (1 to 8). Yet pulsed UV (PL) becomes the only non-invasive sterilization choice for infusion solutions, reviewed for packed in 0.25 l UV semi-transparent PE bags, reaching 0.27 c/bag in operating costs INCLUDING 6 logs reduction of B. Pumilus spores, the most radiation and UV resistant spores of all.

This result is not possible with amalgam lamps. The use of in-line Pulsed Light is also advantageous to amalgam lamps both for sanitation and sterilization of open or PE packed food or pharmaceutical products. SteriBeam offers both choices of lamps for its UV tunnels.

Details are in our White paper of May 2013 which can be found here